My test was almost identical. I have a macro that runs FiveNewLogs, downloads and loads a PQ and the runs FiveNewLogs a second time.
I ran the macro and when it was done, backed up and then reverted to v34. I ran my macro, which should not have changed any data as it was the same PQ that was already loaded. The second run took about 15 seconds. I ran my macro again and got the same results. I then loaded the v35 patch and ran the macro again. The second run now took 200 seconds.
I have a smaller db that has 250 waypoints and another macro that does the same procedure with a different PQ. With v34, the second run is too fast for me to time manually, perhaps 1 second. With v35, it takes about 15 seconds.
I also tested both dbs by simply running FiveNewLogs independently, two times in a row without changing any data, and see the same results between versions.
Thanks...
I ran the macro and when it was done, backed up and then reverted to v34. I ran my macro, which should not have changed any data as it was the same PQ that was already loaded. The second run took about 15 seconds. I ran my macro again and got the same results. I then loaded the v35 patch and ran the macro again. The second run now took 200 seconds.
I have a smaller db that has 250 waypoints and another macro that does the same procedure with a different PQ. With v34, the second run is too fast for me to time manually, perhaps 1 second. With v35, it takes about 15 seconds.
I also tested both dbs by simply running FiveNewLogs independently, two times in a row without changing any data, and see the same results between versions.
Thanks...