@Kai Team and @clyde
My intend was not to bothering lignumaqua or any one else here in the forum. Sorry in case some of my sentences can be misunderstood (I am not a native English speaker and so maybe some words may wrongly chosen. For this I apologize!)
My intend for "argue and argue" is not for the arguing itself, I wanted that my matter of concern is understood correctly (which was obviously not the case if you read the first and third reply to my initial post).
Then I thought we conjointly looking for the best possible solution. Which is in my point of view the proposal of lignumaqua with the meta tags in the notes before section which does not require any modification in the user interface.
Now that we clearly identified the issue and we have a potential solution, we need to know if I am the only one who misses this feature. sbeelis wrote that already in the past people have asked for additional note fields. So it seems that I am not the only one who would be happy about this more flexibility for the sections usage.
For example all cachers on the world who does not have founds in USA, Canada or Australia, or do prefer other maps for these regions than generated by these sections, could reuse easily these sections for individual content.
This is true and I respect the work of lignumaqua and all others who contributes with macro development to GSAK. GSAK wouldn't be by far not that useful without the macros so I vote for that some percentage of license fees for GSAK goes to the macro developers. But this is a different topic.
No offense meant! Thanks to all for their contribution.
Paradinla
My intend was not to bothering lignumaqua or any one else here in the forum. Sorry in case some of my sentences can be misunderstood (I am not a native English speaker and so maybe some words may wrongly chosen. For this I apologize!)
My intend for "argue and argue" is not for the arguing itself, I wanted that my matter of concern is understood correctly (which was obviously not the case if you read the first and third reply to my initial post).
Then I thought we conjointly looking for the best possible solution. Which is in my point of view the proposal of lignumaqua with the meta tags in the notes before section which does not require any modification in the user interface.
Now that we clearly identified the issue and we have a potential solution, we need to know if I am the only one who misses this feature. sbeelis wrote that already in the past people have asked for additional note fields. So it seems that I am not the only one who would be happy about this more flexibility for the sections usage.
For example all cachers on the world who does not have founds in USA, Canada or Australia, or do prefer other maps for these regions than generated by these sections, could reuse easily these sections for individual content.
| QUOTE (clyde) |
| I will remind everyone that lignumaqua is a volunteer and has no financial interest or receives any remuneration from GSAK |
This is true and I respect the work of lignumaqua and all others who contributes with macro development to GSAK. GSAK wouldn't be by far not that useful without the macros so I vote for that some percentage of license fees for GSAK goes to the macro developers. But this is a different topic.
No offense meant! Thanks to all for their contribution.
Paradinla
