I think that there a certain point where Google becomes overwhelmed, but I have not been able to determine what it is.
I have 115,872 caches in my California database. If I run the macro against that with no text labels, I get the "script is not responding" error in Firefox and then get a map centered in Texas with no icons, even if I scroll the map to California. If I filter for either the first or the second half, It works as expected, just takes some time. At first I thought it was a bad cache, or a bad child waypoint that was the problem, but I can get all of the caches to display, just not at the same time.
And before anyone asks why I would want to display so many caches at once, I wanted to see if the Bay area had bigger clusters than the LA area, and I also wanted to see if it would work.
I have 115,872 caches in my California database. If I run the macro against that with no text labels, I get the "script is not responding" error in Firefox and then get a map centered in Texas with no icons, even if I scroll the map to California. If I filter for either the first or the second half, It works as expected, just takes some time. At first I thought it was a bad cache, or a bad child waypoint that was the problem, but I can get all of the caches to display, just not at the same time.
And before anyone asks why I would want to display so many caches at once, I wanted to see if the Bay area had bigger clusters than the LA area, and I also wanted to see if it would work.